Skip to main content
HardHatCalc

Post Size Calculator

Free deck post size calculator for 4x4, 4x6, and 6x6 posts. Enter load, height, and wood species to get the minimum cross-section per IRC R507 deck tables.

Last updated:

Reviewed by Doc. dr. sc. Mladenka Juradin, dipl. ing. građ., PhD, Civil Engineering (FCEAG, University of Split)

lbs

Total axial load on the post. Use tributary area x total PSF to calculate.

ft

Height from top of footing to underside of beam. Taller posts need larger cross-sections.

Pressure-treated SYP is the most common deck post material.

Notching reduces effective cross-section. Avoided in modern deck construction.

How This Is Calculated

A post must pass BOTH checks. (1) IRC 2021 Table R507.4 prescriptive gate: maximum post height by size, species group, and tributary area (tributary area = load ÷ 50 psf, the table's 40 psf live + 10 psf dead basis; linear interpolation between columns; no extrapolation past 160 sq ft or 14 ft). (2) NDS column stability: slenderness ratio = (post height in inches) / (least cross-section dimension), limit 50. Cp = ((1+FcE/Fc)/(2c)) - sqrt(((1+FcE/Fc)/(2c))² - (FcE/Fc)/c), where FcE = 0.822·Emin/(Le/d)², c = 0.8 for sawn lumber. Allowable load = Fc × Cp × cross-section area. Notching reduces effective width by 50%. Inputs outside the prescriptive table are flagged for engineered design, not extrapolated.

Source: Prescriptive limits per IRC 2021 Table R507.4 (Deck Post Height — maximum height by post size, species group, and tributary area; 40 psf live + 10 psf dead basis, No. 2 grade, wet service factor included). Axial compression design per NDS 2024 Chapter 3 — column stability factor Cp accounts for unbraced length and slenderness ratio. Species reference values from NDS 2024 Supplement Table 4A.

7 min read

4x4 vs 4x6 vs 6x6: When Each Size Applies

The most common deck-building mistake is using a 4x4 post where a 6x6 is required. A 4x4 pressure-treated post looks sturdy when you hold it, but its structural limits are surprisingly low — especially when notched for a beam bearing.

A 4x4 post (3.5 by 3.5 inches actual, not the nominal 4 by 4) is allowed more range under the 2021 IRC than older rules of thumb suggested — Table R507.4 permits a southern pine 4x4 up to 14 feet at 20 square feet of tributary area. The allowance drops fast as the area grows: roughly 9'-5" at 80 square feet and only 6'-2" at 160 for southern pine, while the Douglas fir/hem-fir/SPF group is not permitted at all past about 120 square feet. The slenderness ratio (height divided by width) is what drives the drop — at 8 feet tall, a 4x4 is already at 27.4, where buckling starts to govern over pure compression strength.

A 4x6 post (3.5" x 5.5" actual) adds 57% more cross-section than a 4x4 and buys several extra feet of permitted height at the same tributary area — for southern pine, about 12'-0" at 80 square feet against the 4x4's 9'-5". The wider dimension also provides better bearing surface for beam connections.

A 6x6 post (5.5" x 5.5" actual) is the workhorse for standard deck construction. Southern pine 6x6s are permitted to the table's full 14-foot height across every tributary column; the Douglas fir group holds 14 feet through 100 square feet before tapering. Most builders default to 6x6 for all deck posts because the cost difference per post (about $36 more than a 4x4 at 8 feet in this tool's pricing) is trivial compared to the structural margin it provides. Posts are a minor line in the overall budget, where the bigger drivers of deck cost are decking material, deck size, and labour. The tributary load tool determines the total load each post carries so you can size it correctly.

Two caveats before you trust any row of that table. First, it assumes 40 psf live + 10 psf dead load; if your ground snow load is above that basis, the calculator's conversion errs conservative, but for heavy snow country use Table R507.4 directly or ask an engineer. Second, many jurisdictions amend the IRC to require 6x6 deck posts regardless of tributary area — check your local amendments before framing around a smaller post.

Top-down diagram of a deck framing plan showing how tributary area is calculated for each post based on beam span and joist span.
Tributary area for a deck post is determined by half the beam span times half the joist span.

The Notching Problem

Notching a deck post to create a bearing ledge for the beam is the most structurally risky practice still used in residential deck building. When you cut a notch into a 4x4, you remove half the cross-section at the most critical point — the beam bearing location, where the full load transfers from beam to post. The remaining wood at the notch is only 1.75 inches wide, creating a stress concentration that can split the post along the grain.

The IRC now discourages post notching for exactly this reason. IRC R507.5.2 requires notched posts to be sized for the beam they carry (Table R507.4 footnote d points there directly), and many jurisdictions have banned notching of 4x4 deck posts entirely. A 6x6 post notched for a standard 2x beam still retains a 3.5-inch minimum section at the notch — the same as an unnotched 4x4 — which is why 6x6 is the practical minimum when beam-notching is planned.

The better approach is to use post-to-beam connectors (Simpson Strong-Tie PBS or similar hardware) that bolt the beam to the side of the post without removing any wood. These connectors maintain the full post cross-section, eliminate the splitting risk, and are code-accepted in all jurisdictions. They cost $8-$15 per connector — far less than the risk of a notched post failure.

The post size calculator above accounts for notching in its capacity calculation. If you select "notched," the effective width drops by 50%, which typically pushes the minimum post up by one size. This is the right approach for planning: if you must notch, size the post for the reduced section.

Maximum Post Load by Size, Height, and Species

The table below shows approximate maximum axial loads (lbs) for unnotched posts by size and height. Values are for No. 1/No. 2 grade, pressure-treated lumber. Actual capacities depend on grade, moisture conditions, and connection details.

Post Size 4 ft Height 6 ft Height 8 ft Height 10 ft Height 12 ft Height
4x4 SYP 17,200 13,800 10,400 7,600 5,500
4x6 SYP 23,400 20,200 17,100 14,000 11,200
6x6 SYP 38,900 35,600 32,200 28,800 25,400
4x4 DF 15,600 12,500 9,400 6,900 5,000
6x6 DF 35,300 32,300 29,200 26,100 23,000
4x4 SPF 11,900 9,600 7,200 5,300 3,800
6x6 SPF 27,200 24,800 22,500 20,100 17,700

Values calculated using NDS 2024 column stability formulas with Emin adjustment. The sharp drop in 4x4 capacity at taller heights shows why slenderness, not just compression strength, governs tall post selection.

For the footings beneath each post, you can check pier diameter and depth based on the post load and soil bearing capacity.

Installing Deck Posts Correctly

Proper post installation is as important as correct sizing. A correctly sized post installed poorly can fail just as readily as an undersized one.

  1. Set the footing first. The post bears on a concrete footing that extends below the frost line. Never set a wood post directly in the ground — even pressure-treated lumber rots at the soil contact point within 5-10 years. Use a post base connector (Simpson ABU or CB series) anchored to the footing with a J-bolt or epoxy anchor to hold the post above the concrete surface.

  2. Cut posts to exact height. Measure from the top of the footing to the underside of the beam for each post individually. Ground levels vary, and cutting all posts to the same length produces a sloped deck. Use a water level or laser level to mark the beam height, then measure down to each footing.

  3. Plumb each post in both directions. Use a 4-foot level on two adjacent faces. Brace the post temporarily with angled 2x4 supports nailed to stakes. Do not rely on the beam or framing to pull a leaning post plumb — the fasteners will carry shear load they were not designed for.

  4. Connect beam to post. Use approved post-to-beam hardware (post caps or through-bolts) rather than toenailing or notching. Through-bolts need two 1/2-inch bolts minimum. Post caps (Simpson BC series) sit on the post top and cradle the beam, transferring load cleanly.

  5. Add diagonal bracing if required. Posts taller than 8 feet in seismic zones or high-wind areas may need knee braces or cross-bracing. Check your local code — many jurisdictions require lateral bracing for any deck post over 6 feet, not just tall structures.

Lateral Forces and Bracing

Deck posts resist two types of force: axial compression (the weight pushing straight down) and lateral force (wind, occupant movement, and seismic action pushing sideways). The calculator above sizes for axial load, but lateral resistance also matters.

Wind load. Wind pushes against the deck railing, enclosed siding (on screened porches), and the underside of elevated decks. The taller the deck, the more wind force each post experiences. A 12-foot screened porch post in a 90 mph wind zone can see 300-500 lbs of lateral force — enough to demand cross-bracing or a moment connection at the base.

Occupant lateral force. People lean on railings, push against posts, and shift weight during gatherings. The IRC assumes 200 lbs concentrated at the top of any railing post. For the deck structure posts, lateral resistance comes from the rigidity of the beam-post-footing assembly.

Seismic force. In seismic design categories D through F, lateral bracing is required for elevated decks. Diagonal knee braces (typically 2x6 at 45 degrees) connecting the post to the beam provide the simplest solution. Each knee brace must be bolted at both ends — not nailed — with 1/2-inch bolts.

When to add bracing. If your deck is elevated more than 6 feet above grade, is in a high-wind zone (110+ mph), or has screened or enclosed walls, add diagonal bracing. Most decks under 6 feet with open railings do not require bracing, but check local amendments to the IRC — some jurisdictions add bracing requirements below the national threshold. The deck board calculator estimates the decking material once the structure is sized.

Worked Examples

Example 1

Scenario: A deck builder needs to size corner posts for a 16x20-foot deck at 8-foot height. Each corner post has a tributary area of 8x10 feet = 80 sq ft. Total load (live + dead) is 50 PSF plus 10 PSF for railing and snow, so 60 PSF x 80 sq ft = 4,800 lbs per post. Species is Southern Yellow Pine, posts are not notched.

Calculation: Tributary area = 4,800 lbs ÷ 50 psf (the table's 40 psf live + 10 psf dead basis) = 96 sq ft. IRC Table R507.4 for southern pine permits a 4x4 at 96 sq ft up to about 8'-6" (interpolated between 9'-5" at 80 sq ft and 8'-4" at 100 sq ft), so the 8-ft post clears the height limit. NDS check: slenderness ratio = 96 / 3.5 = 27.4; allowable load ≈ 10,290 lbs; 4,800 ÷ 10,290 = 47% of capacity. The 4x4 passes both checks. Estimated cost: $28 (8 ft × $3.50/ft pressure-treated SYP, March 2026 US pricing).

What this means: A 4x4 clears both the code table and the engineering check at 47% capacity. The result surprises many builders: the 2021 IRC table permits taller 4x4s at moderate tributary areas than older rules of thumb suggested. Note the conversion is conservative — the 60 psf actual loading is treated as extra tributary area at the table's 50 psf basis.

Takeaway: Passing is not the same as optimal. Many crews still upsize corner posts to 6x6 for stiffness, wider beam bearing, and connector options — sound practice, but a preference, not a code requirement at this load. Check local amendments before relying on a 4x4: some jurisdictions require 6x6 deck posts regardless of tributary area. The cost difference at 8 feet is about $36 per post in this tool's pricing ($28 vs $64).

Example 2

Scenario: A tall screened porch requires 12-foot posts supporting a roof. Each post carries 3,500 lbs (light roof load, small tributary area of 50 sq ft). Species is Douglas Fir, posts are not notched.

Calculation: Tributary area = 3,500 lbs ÷ 50 psf = 70 sq ft at the table basis. Per IRC Table R507.4 for the Douglas fir group, a 4x4 at 70 sq ft is limited to roughly 7'-9" and a 4x6 to about 10'-3" — both below the 12-ft post height. The 6x6 is permitted to the table's full 14'-0". NDS check on the 6x6: slenderness ratio = 144 / 5.5 = 26.2 (well under the limit of 50), using about 13% of axial capacity. Estimated cost: $114 (12 ft × $9.50/ft pressure-treated DF, March 2026).

What this means: Height is the limiting factor here, not load. Even with a light 3,500-lb load, the 12-foot unbraced height rules out the 4x4 and 4x6 in the code table — buckling risk grows with the square of slenderness, which is why the table cuts tall skinny posts off early.

Takeaway: Above roughly 10 feet, the prescriptive table pushes most deck and porch posts to 6x6 at common tributary areas. The big capacity reserve (13%) is what you want on a tall post: stiffness against sway, not just strength against crushing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use a 4x4 post for an 8-foot-tall deck?

It depends on the tributary load area. Under IRC 2021 Table R507.4, a southern pine 4x4 clears 8 feet up to roughly 107 square feet of tributary area (interpolated), but the Douglas fir/hem-fir/SPF group cuts off near 65 square feet, and some jurisdictions amend the code to require 6x6 deck posts outright. A 6x6 remains the safer default for any deck at 8-foot height — the cost difference is about $36 per post in this tool's pricing, negligible compared to the risk of re-framing. The post-load sizing tool helps you determine the total load each post carries so you can size with confidence.

Why is notching a deck post considered bad practice?

Notching removes wood at the exact point where the full structural load transfers from beam to post. A standard notch in a 4x4 reduces the effective width to 1.75 inches — half the original section — creating a stress concentration that can split the post along the grain. The IRC now requires notched posts to be evaluated for the reduced section, and many jurisdictions ban notching of 4x4 posts entirely. Post-to-beam connectors (bolted hardware) maintain the full post section and are the recommended alternative. A complete list of hardware and lumber for the project is covered in the hardware-and-lumber rundown.

How do I calculate the load on each deck post?

Multiply the tributary area by the total design load. Tributary area is the rectangle of deck floor that each post supports — for a corner post, it is typically half the beam span times half the joist span. Total design load includes live load (40 PSF for decks per IRC R301.5), dead load (10-15 PSF for the deck structure), and snow load if applicable. A corner post on a 16x20 deck with 8-foot beam spacing and 10-foot joist span supports 4x5 = 20 sq ft of tributary area at 55 PSF total = 1,100 lbs per post. Use that load figure to plan pier footing depth and the concrete pad under each post.

What wood species is best for deck posts?

Pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine is the most common and cost-effective choice for deck posts. It offers high compression strength (Fc = 1,650 PSI for No. 1 grade), takes pressure treatment well, and is widely available. Douglas Fir-Larch has similar strength but is more common in western states. Western Red Cedar resists rot naturally but has lower compression strength, so it requires larger post sizes for the same load. SPF (Spruce-Pine-Fir) is budget-friendly but the weakest option — use it only for low-load, short-height applications. The species-by-species beam pricer compares species pricing for the beam that sits on top of these posts.

More Structural calculators

Browse all structural calculators — Beam sizing, truss pricing, load calculations, wall framing, deck capacity, and foundation tools.

Feedback